- Browse bikes
- Top bikes
- News & reviews
- Free classifieds
95 Triumph Daytona 1200 discussion forum:
RE: daytona 1200
|RE: daytona 1200|
|Steve said 2002-06-26 06:51|
I suspect that the "problem" with the anonymous posterīs Daytona 1200 was simply the two pre-filters. I used to work at a Triumph dealership and that was a common performance issue with all T3 series bikes. I also own a Daytona 1200 and at the first service, 500 miles, I removed the pre-filters before they could fill up with sediment and block the fuel lines.
The claim of 176 horsepower sounds a bit optimistic to me. I had my bike dynoed at 118hp in stock trim. Now, Triumph claimed 145hp and that was most likely at the crankshaft, so 118hp is roughly 18.6% less than their claim. Now that sounds reasonable (most bikes loose about 15% between the crank to the ground). I can attest to the fact that the big Daytona will pull away from a 2000 ZX9 and it will do so without all of the extra performance mods.
The mods that I have made to my bike are as follows: K&N air filter, K&N jet kit, and a pair of D&D carbon fiber slip-ons. My seat of the pants dyno tells me that I have a bit more power on tap, but I havenīt put the machine back on a real dyno to find out.
If I could start over and spend the same money on performance mods I would probably do things a bit differently. First, I suppose that the K&N filter makes good sense because when you change the stock filter, you have to replace the entire air-box assembly ($60.00) and the K&N costs about the same (reusable to boot). While the 1200 Daytona will stomp a R1 or ZX9 on a straight highway, it is no match for them in the twisties. So, the next thing I would do would be to put a pair of RaceTech springs and Gold Valves in the forks and replace the rear shock with a middle of the road Penske or Ohlins unit. The improvement in suspension would even the playing field a bit more allowing you to corner much faster. Finally, after 30K miles or so, when the stock jets are fairly worn, I might consider the jet kit and slip-ons.
I really donīt know how much the timing advancer will help. Another guy I knew while working at the Triumph dealer had a T3 series Daytona 900, and after installing the timing advancer he didnīt see any significant improvement on the dyno (1 hp). So, I would guess that the Daytona 1200 would fair similarly. In other words, the advancer might help a little, but you could probably find more productive use of you money on other performance mods.
|Answer this message Show discussion overview|
More 1995 Triumph Daytona 1200 informationOur discussion groups are intended for short messages. We also welcome more extensive motorcycle reviews.
Bikez also recommends that you check out the technical data and the riders' rating for the 95 Triumph Daytona 1200. You can also rate it yourself. Use our efficient motorcycle classifieds to sell or buy this bike. Your motorbike gets a high quality presentation. Ads are free.